11/22/2023 0 Comments 377x198 runescape images![]() ![]() I don't think an immediate AIV would be necessary, although AN/I might be appropriate. You can't possibly run a password scam in good faith, so I'm wondering if I should really have just left him/her a by the way. block log) tried the old "send your username and password to this yahoo email address! Its official Jagex! Honest!" scam.If we do, we'll post a thread in their Tavern forum about it (I think that's the right forum). ![]() I'd like some input on whether we should do this or not. Despite this, I think it would be a good idea to recruit editors from the RuneScape wiki. The downside might be that RuneScape players unfamiliar with the differences between our policies and the RuneScape wiki's might add more fancruft at first. Another useful advantage of this is that the editors from the RuneScape wiki would already be familiar with at least basic wiki markup. Possible benefits of this include greater project participation, a wider perspective on articles covered by our task force, and obscure but valuable information from game experts. Should we try to recruit some experienced RuneScape players from the RuneScape wiki and get them to join our Task Force? We currently encourage people who add fancruft to go there, so why not encourage experienced players from there to come here? We need to make sure that editing Wikipedia is as simple as possible.- Ed ❼ómo estás? 23:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Most of the references do make the text hard to read, making it difficult for potential editors to contribute. So, what does everyone think? Should we keep it the way it is, put each parameter on a separate line, or put the whole reference on a separate line? (I personally support separate lines for each parameter after removing unused parameters, as in the last example.) Pyrospirit Flames Fire 13:35, 14 March 2007 (UTC) I like the last example. Actually, we should probably remove all unused parameters from the citation templates whether we reformat them like this or not. It now looks quite a bit cleaner and doesn't take up much space at all. However, here's what the second method would look like if I removed unused parameters: The isometric view was replaced by a mixture of both [[3D computer graphics|three. It would work to separate references from the rest of the text, but it wouldn't break up the reference template as nicely. This way simply has the entire reference on a different line than the text around it. Jagex|pages= |language= English|archiveurl= |archivedate=}}Īnd was originally operated from their parents' house in Nottingham. Takes up a lot of room in the edit window though. :-/ CaptainVindaloo t c e 00:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC) Here's another way we could do it: The isometric view was replaced by a mixture of both [[3D computer graphics|three. Pyrospirit Flames Fire 19:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC) It is much easier to read.- Ed ❼ómo estás? 23:19, 13 March 2007 (UTC) Aye, it is. and was originally operated from their parents' house in Nottingham. Jagex|pages= |language= English|archiveurl= |archivedate=}} and was originally operatedĬongrats to EXCL for winning the jagex comp and excl keep up the good work |coauthors= |date= |year= 2006|month= |format= |work=RuneScape Knowledge Base |publisher= |accessdate= |accessmonthday= |accessyear= |author= |last= |first= |authorlink= Release life cycle#Beta|beta]] version on ] ], The game, renamed ''RuneScape'', was released to the public as a [[Software The isometric view was replaced by a mixture of both ] and ] [[Sprite (computer graphics) Using a passage from the RuneScape article, here's an example of how it works: I found an interesting format for citations used by the article Magic: The Gathering that makes the wiki markup much easier to read in areas with lots of citations. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |